Showing posts with label Independent Films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Independent Films. Show all posts

6/13/11

Film Review - Yellowbrickroad

"I do believe in spooks, I do believe in spooks. I do, I do, I do, I do believe in spooks, I do believe in spooks, I do, I do, I do, I do!"- The Cowardly Lion (The Wizard of Oz)


One Morning in New England, 1940, the entire population of Friar New Hampshire - 572 people - walked together up a winding mountain trail and into the wilderness. They left behind their clothes, their money, all of their essentials. Even their dogs were abandoned, tied to posts and left to starve. No One knows why. A search party dispatched by the U.S. Army eventually discovered the remains of nearly 300 of Friar's evacuees. Many had frozen to death. Others were cruelly and mysteriously slaughtered. The bodies of the remaining citizens are still unaccounted for. Over the years, a quiet cover-up operation managed to weave the story of Friar into the stuff of legends and backwoods fairy tales. The town has slowly repopulated, but the vast wilderness is mostly untracked, with the northern-most stretches off limits to local hunters and loggers. In 2008, the coordinates for the "YELLOWBRICKROAD" trail head were declassified...


And that my friends, is pretty much all the history or back story you are going to get from filmmakers Jesse Holland and Andy Mitton regarding the strange events at the heart of their cerebral, independent horror film, Yellowbrickroad. From the outset you should know, this isn't so much a story about discovery or revelations, it's a story about ideas and surreal concepts. Or rather, it's about the journey, not the destination. The mystery doesn't so much unfold as it does build. Think, David Lynch by way of Stephen King if they were both still enrolled in art school and had yet to fully harness their voices (perhaps an irrelevant comparison, as both men were arguably in full command of their creative muscles even then, but you know what I am saying).


Onto the scene and into this promising premise arrive our determined husband and wife team of Teddy (Michael Laurino, Past Life) and Melissa Barnes (Anessa Ramsey, The Signal), hellbent on unraveling the secrets behind Friar's mysterious disappearances for the purposes of a book they wish to publish. They quickly assemble a capable team of explorers that consists of their intern (Tara Giordano), a pair of cartographer siblings (real life brother and sister Clark and Cassidy Freeman), a representative from the Forestry Department (Sam Elmore), their close friend Walter (Alex Draper, Joshua, Mimic 2) who handily is a professor of behavioral psychology and lastly, a vaguely sinister resident of Friar with shadowy motives who is insistent on tagging along (Laura Heisler). Things start off promisingly enough (for both the team on screen and the viewers) as the pioneers embark from the trail head located within the town's dusty old Rialto theater (swoon) wherein it is revealed that the left behind copy of The Wizard of Oz has been re-watched to the point of unplayability. From there, the journey quickly moves into the encroaching New Hampshire forests and you know if you've seen even a handful of these films, that few if any of them, will be coming back.


What first appears to be a slow start to the proceedings reveals itself to be Yellowbrickroad's entire approach to the whole of its material. The director / screenwriting team of Holland and Mitton aren't interested in false jump scares in the least and bless them (to the best of my recollection) never once attempt to throw any the audiences' way. There are no threats bursting from the darkness of the woods accompanied by some bombastic musical stings here (there is no score either for that matter). No, their approach is to let the story's inherent creepiness slowly tighten the screws in both the characters' and our minds. It's an approach so applaudable in this day and age of CGI distractions and attention deficit editing that it's a damn shame they are only halfway successful at handling the film's deliberate leanings. They casually build to the films first unsettling occurrence (eerie music from another time and place begins to fill the air of the surrounding forest, stemming not from one isolated location but seemingly brought forth by the land itself) by allowing the audience to organically get accustomed to the characters for 30 some minutes. First with repeated scenes of them palling around campsites and then through the use psychoanalytic video interviews with their resident headshrinker (a nod to the found footage sub-genre that this movie amazingly resisted becoming). So when the aforementioned odd event finally does occur, it literally chills the blood with its implications of grander, nearly cosmic horror to come.


However, it is here where Yellowbrickroad takes a detour down the wrong path. Not only does the film never build on this initial event save to merely reuse it for most of its remaining running time, but the film never builds to much on a whole. There is no third act race to the finish. There is no climatic showdown. All approaches which would be fine if the material from beginning to end were compelling enough to warrant this restraint. Unfortunately (and hypothetically) it is in concept but not in Holland and Mitton's execution of it. The thing of it is, is that Yellowbrickroad has a terrible sense of pacing.The film literally ebbs and flows for most of the last hour. Something rather startling will occur that will get our blood levels up and then the movie rewinds for more ponderous walking through the woods or introspective pit stops along the path. Again, an approach that has merit but not when the characters, despite the script's many attempts at their development, are so uninteresting (it doesn't help that the movie kills off its most lively lass first). This would've been the sensible approach considering that the threat on the Yellowbrickroad comes not from outside, but from within, as the winding, never ending trail our characters are traveling, literally begins to unravel their minds, turning them against one another in delirious fits of psychotic insanity. However again, the characters in question are just too damn drab so much of this falls flat. Honestly dear readers, I imagine the less patient amongst you will be bored to tears.


I've reserved my biggest complaint for Yellowbrickroad till last and that is this. Despite the film's many commendable attempts at subtle scares and a genuine sense of unearthly atmosphere, the movie on a whole is one big missed opportunity and nowhere is this more apparent than with the handling of its Wizard of Oz motifs that in truth, is the the flick's bread and butter. I was never expecting (nor wanting) a dark, horrific retelling of Victor Fleming's musical masterpiece (that film's source material by L. Frank Baum is at times ghastly enough). However, I can't wrap my head around why they would go some places (the scarecrow makes a frightening appearance) and not others (no Tin Woodsman, no Cowardly Lion, and most unforgivably, no damn witch). If nothing else, the prospect that the filmmakers had within their grasps the means to make some very disturbing creative salutes to that much cherished classic and then content themselves with plodding along rather then running with that opportunity, is wholly frustrating. I'm not telling anybody how to make their movie. I recognize my place. I'm the nerdy guy sitting in front of my computer free from having to say any of this to anybody involved in the film's production and they are the ones sweating behind a camera trying their damndest to make a mark with their tiny independent film. I get that. I appreciate and respect that dichotomy. But c'mon guys, ya couldn't have just gone for it? Just a little? Not even Toto? David Lynch's Wild At Heart had more Oz allusions and that movie wasn't even titled after a locale from that fabled land of dreams and nightmares.


In the end however (but not the film's end, that's just a lark) I did enjoy myself throughout most of Yellowbrickroad's running time (when I wasn't busy being disappointed that I wasn't getting blown away by it). Despite the filmmakers' mishandling of their own engaging concept, there is much to admire sporadically throughout for fans of dreadfully creeping ambiance. The aforementioned ghostly music really works for about a whole act at raising the hairs on one's arms before building to its (and the movie's) most fiendishly hallucinatory, brilliantly weird moment at the halfway mark (and yes, before retreating with its tail between its legs again). The actors are engrossing whereas their characters aren't so much. And Bloody-Disgusting truly should be applauded for making some very adventurous, outside the mainstream acquirements (Cold Fish and Atrocious wait in the wings while Rammbock is out now on DVD) for their new distribution arm Bloody-Disgusting Selects. It's a striking release tableau that many other likemided distributors could do worse than emulate (After Dark anyone). Even though this particular film is a mixed bag, it should be noted that after the film ended I spent the better part of an hour in bed tossing and turning it around in my brain. Partially criticizing the end result and partially applauding the fact that many of the film's finer moments really stuck with me. Recommended to the most accommodating of viewers, oftentimes Yellowbrickroad will likely frustrate you to no end, but because some of it works wonderfully, it will also make you think twice before stepping foot into those tree lined rolling hills. Even the seemingly serene and sunlit ones.




Skull Ratings:
5 Skulls - The Best
4 Skulls - Very Good
3 Skulls - Good / Average
2 Skulls - Poor
1 Skull - The Worst

5/9/11

Trailer Park Roundup

The Best Of This Week's Theatrical Trailers

Beyond the Black Rainbow
Set in the strange and oppressive emotional landscape of the year 1983, Beyond The Black Rainbow is a Reagan-era fever dream inspired by hazy childhood memories of midnight movies and Saturday morning cartoons. From the producer of Machotaildrop, Rainbow is the outlandish feature film debut of writer and director Panos Cosmatos. Featuring a hypnotic analog synthesizer score by Jeremy Schmidt of Sinoia Caves and Black Mountain, Beyond the Black Rainbow is an experience to the senses.



Potential:


I'm an absolute sucker for trippy, psychedelic horror films (Pop Skull, Amer, Subconscious Cruelty) and Beyond the Black Rainbow is looking to be no exception. I'm even a bigger fan of horror films that manage to successfully meld elements of sci-fi and social commentary into their fear laden narrative and again, Rainbow is looking to have both in spades. Set in 1983? Another Grindhouse homage complete with a VHS release? Seven-foot-tall creatures with baby heads? Yes please!


Final Destination 5
In this fifth installment, Death is just as omnipresent as ever, and is unleashed after one man’s premonition saves a group of coworkers from a terrifying suspension bridge collapse. But this group of unsuspecting souls was never supposed to survive, and, in a terrifying race against time, the ill-fated group frantically tries to discover a way to escape Death’s sinister agenda. The new victims of Death’s plan are part of a cast led by Emma Bell (Frozen, TV’s The Walking Dead) and Nick D’Agosto (Fired Up!, TV’s Heroes). The film is being shot on location in Vancouver, Canada. The second of the Final Destination films to be shot in 3-D, Final Destination 5 is being directed by Steve Quale, marking his major feature film directorial debut. Producer Craig Perry (American Pie) returns for the fifth time, working with executive producers Sheila Hanahan Taylor, Erik Holmberg, Richard Brener, Walter Hamada and David Neustadter. The screenplay was written by Eric Heisserer, with revisions by Gary Dauberman; Heisserer is no stranger to the horror genre, having penned New Line’s recent hit A Nightmare on Elm Street. Collaborating with Steve Quale behind the scenes are director of photography Brian Pearson (Drive Angry 3D, My Bloody Valentine 3D); production designer David Sandefur (Repo Men, Journey to the Center of the Earth); editor Eric Sears (Shooter) and costume designer Jori Woodman (Eight Below).



Potential:


Wow. This sequel is coming outta the gate a helluva lot faster than most sequels that follow up previous entries that purport to be the final installments. Why? Money and the millions of it to be made, of course. Because I would hedge a hefty bet it most likely doesn't have anything to do with rescuing the franchise from the hole of sucktitude that it drove itself into with the most recent sequels. I love the first film and truth, I may love the second one even more. However, with Final Destination 3, the show runners completely and utterly ruined a good thing by presenting us characters that were either so paper thin or so familiar they seemed like parodies of stereotypes, add to this tepid death scenes (save for the tanning bed sequence which was equal parts awesome and unimaginably mean spirited and cruel) and an opening catastrophe that had the potential to be the one to beat, but fell apart in a whirlwind of CGI cartoonery and credibility stretching ridiculous (and I'm even terrified of roller coasters, but alas, not that one). The Final Destination (accent on "The", liars) improved things marginally, but just barely. At either rate, by film's end, it definitely seemed as though the Destination series had prematurely grown long in the tooth way before its time, and it was indeed it was ready to be put it to rest.

Apparently this burial wasn't to be because soon we'll find ourselves back in the world of wash, rinse and repeat formulaic storytelling and Rube Goldberg-esque machinations of death. I'd be positively thrilled about this return if I felt as though the filmmakers have learned anything from their mistakes and were attempting to get the franchise back on track, but then I remember that these movies make lots of money and I'm certain that in the ego stroking, circle jerk world of Hollywood, those box office numbers are all the filmmakers need to validate what have become cinematic blights. Add to this more headache inducing 3-D, names attached behind the scenes that don't necessarily inspire confidence (Eric Heisserer of the 2010's A Nightmare on Elm Street anyone) and well, it's Final Destination 5 for crying out loud.

There are some promising diamonds in the rough though. Namely, cute as a button Emma Bell (quickly becoming a genre veteran), Tony Todd's return, a rather rousing trailer and a bridge collapse that if done right, could undue all the progress I've made regarding crossing them since The Mothman Prophecies made me pee my pants and effectively made me a land-only traveler.
Time will tell, but I'm not expecting much.

Absentia

Tricia's husband has been missing for seven years. Her younger sister Callie comes to live with her as the pressure mounts to finally declare him 'dead in absentia.' As Tricia sifts through the wreckage and tries to move on with her life, Callie finds herself drawn to an ominous tunnel near the house. As she begins to link it to other mysterious disappearances, it becomes clear that his presumed death might be anything but 'natural.' Soon it becomes clear that the ancient force at work in the tunnel might have set its sights on Callie and Tricia ... and that Tricia's husband might be suffering a fate far worse than death in its grasp.

Absentia is the inaugural feature film of Fallback Plan Productions, co-founded by Morgan Peter Brown and Justin Gordon. Initial funding for the project was achieved through an ambitious (and hugely popular) Kickstarter.com campaign, in which the film raised 156% of its stated $15,000 goal in 30 days.

After private investors stepped in to fully fund the project, the film went into production in June, 2010 and shot for 15 days in Glendale, Los Angeles, and Orange County, CA.



Potential:


There is lots of positive word of mouth attached to this baby, and after that impressively creepy trailer, I'm starting to get an idea of why. Monsters and ghosts? Sign me up! The only uncertainty that lingers over my admittedly strong anticipation of for Mike Flanagan's Absentia is the price tag involved in it's production. No, I am not a snob and I wholly commend his grassroots efforts in financing his film. However, I have just found over the years that if the right amount of finesse is not used while making supernaturally themed horror films, their micro-budgets can sometimes seriously hamper any attempts at atmosphere, and strong atmosphere is thee de facto element that every good ghost story requires. It appears to be a tricky tightrope to walk, because for every success like Paranormal Activity, there are hundreds of tensionless, independent spook shows cluttering up video store shelves leaving me to believe that the director must have masterful command over the use of subtlety and yes, his budget. Having voiced that concern, I am leaning more of the direction that Absentia is going to pull it all off (plus, the two leading ladies already have me engaged), leaving many with a serious case of the heebie jeebies. Here's hoping.


Martha Marcy May Marlene
Haunted by painful memories and paranoia, a damaged woman struggles to reassimilate with her family after fleeing an abusive cult.




Potential:


Well first off, fuck yeah to the inspired casting of John Hawkes. Ever since he came out of the shadow of playing goofy supporting characters and took center stage in Miranda July's endearing comedy of quirks, Me and You and Everyone We Know, his face has been one that I haven't seen nearly enough in cinema. Martha Marcy May Marlene's chills look to be those of a more subdued, adult endeavor, but the trailer provides glimpses of disturbing potential in addition to powerhouse acting and sumptuous cinematography of the eastern countryside. Glowing advance word of mouth follows this one wherever it goes and this viewer, is certainly soon to follow.

1/16/11

Best Horror Films Of The Year - 2010

Burning Bright
(2010, Written by Christine Coyle Johnson, Julie Prendiville Roux and David Higgins, Directed by Carlos Brooks)




Tyger! Tyger! burning bright,
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye

Could frame thy fearful symmetry?


In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire in thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?

What the hand dare seize the fire?

And w
hat shoulder, and what art?
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?

And when thy heart began to beat,

What dread hand, and what dread feet?


What the hammer? What the chain?

In what furnace was thy brain?

What the anvil? What dread grasp

Dare its deadly terrors clasp?


When the stars threw down their spears,

And watered heaven with their tears,

Did he smile his work to see?

Did he who made the
Lamb, make thee?

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright,

In th
e forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye

Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?


- William Blake


If there is one film on this year's list that absolutely should collapse under the weight of it's own seemingly ridiculous plot, one film that just should not work whatsoever, it is this film, Burning Bright (or as I like to call it, "Tiger Nom"). I remember sometime ago when news of it going into pre-production caught my attention and the simultaneous groan and eye rolling that spontaneously erupted from my person followed by an annoyed fit of giggles when I thought back over the production's contrived, sentence-long plot synopsis I had just read. It read as follows: Burning Bright is a thriller centered on a young woman and her autistic little brother who are trapped in a house with a ravenous tiger during a hurricane. Preposterous huh? Also at the time, I wasn't aware of who was doing it so I didn't know whether I should be expecting some SyFy, "when animals attack" type travesty, or some bigger profile, high concept studio garbage foisted upon an innocent, unsuspecting world. I was expecting trash, infinitely forgettable trash, at either rate. Oh, what an nescient, thickheaded time those days were. Years later, now that the film has gotten a small release (by the ever neglectful Lionsgate. Seriously guys, why do you keep dumping your gems into the void of DVD obscurity?), let history show that I couldn't have been more terribly, utterly wrong in my assumptions. Miraculously, it's plot (still contrived as it is), works. It works quite well, in fact. Lets expand upon it shall we?

The small Taylor clan, Kelly, her younger brother Tom and their step-father Johnny are about to come apart at the seams. Money is tight after the suicide of the family's matriarch, Catherine (Mary Rachel Dudley). Of her surviving children, Kelly (Briana Evigan) is losing her mind from the pressing day-to-day responsibilities of looking after her young austitc brother (Charlie Tahan). She has postponed leaving for college several times now out of the misguided notion that Tom needs her at home to look after him. Her college tuition she has been letting sit is about to be reassigned to someone else if she doesn't pack her bags and leave for school soon. Matters are not helped any by their step-father Johnny (Garret Dillahunt), who is squandering what little money they have on a get rich quick scheme he's cooked up of transforming their family's property into a "safari zoo" for wild and exotic animals (the film's first scene, with a cameo by Meat Loaf which perfectly sets the movie's tone). Desperate, Kelly finally makes a bid for her freedom by planning to enroll Tom in a school for children with special needs, but upon meeting with an adviser from the school, she discovers that the money she has set aside for the enrollment has mysteriously been withdrawn from her bank account. Returning home to confront the culprit, her step-father (stemming from echoes of dark fairytale myth in the film, Dillahunt plays Johnny somewhere between wicked, plotting step-father and conniving backwoods hick, bravo) , Kelly is speechless to find that Johnny has robbed both her brother and her of a future by spending the money on a Bengal tiger named Lucifer (that has been banished from the circus due to it's ferocious disposition). Johnny claims it's going to be the safari zoo's star attraction. Amidst this, there are men outside setting up Lucifer's temporary living quarters and workers boarding up the Taylor's home. Every window, every door is being securely sealed. A hurricane is fast approaching you see, one that should be upon them by nightfall. However, it's nothing that they haven't ridden out before. So, the Taylors opt to bunker down and stay put in their newly fortified home until the storm passes while Johnny chooses to sit it out down at the local pub with the small town's remaining residents. Later that night, as the furious winds batter the house and the storm rages overhead, Kelly awakens (from a particularly nasty nightmare wherein she fatally rid herself of her guardianship of her brother) and descends down stairs. Besides the obvious maelstrom of the hurricane, there is a new, curious creaking that can be heard inside the home. seconds later, Kelly discovers the source of this pitter patter. Luicfer is loose from his cage and inside the house. The very house that Kelly soon discovers that her and her brother have been sealed inside. There is no way in and no way out and Lucifer is very, very hungry.

Phwew. That was a remarkable amount of exposition for a film whose plot is (honestly) so threadbare. Then, you folks aren't reading a review for a movie about a psychotic tiger because you are in the mood for a Merchant Ivory production. Amirite? Anyway, what follows is an insanely intense, neverending series of cat and mouse set pieces between the siblings and the sneaking, stalking beast. Strangely, the film I felt Burning Bright owed it's biggest debt to was John Carpenter's original Halloween. Or rather, the final 15 minutes of Halloween wherein Laurie Strode is mercilessly pursued by Michael Myers. Like Laurie, Kelly is a very smart, very capable (and thanks to Evigan's performance, very memorable) heroine left with a defenseless charge that she must protect and like Mike Myers, Lucifer is a very cunning, very unstoppable adversary (and yes, there is even a closet attack).Perhaps it is a stretch, but that is what came to mind when I was watching Burning Bright with my blanket pulled nearly up past my eyes. It's also every bit the compliment (and then some) that I feel that the film deserves to be lauded with. This would have made a killer drive-in feature back in the day and that too, is a compliment.

The film though, isn't all that interested in plot and frankly, that's fine in this instance. Once the opening act is out of the way, the script moves into pure (nearly dialogue free, considering that Tom is mute and the crux of their survival depends on the two sibling being very, very sneaky) action territory. It's a gambit that could have spelled it's ruin considering that it is a PG-13 rated feature with such a small cast. You would think that you would be yawning. You would think that there would be nary an ounce of suspense. You would think that with only two people (and children at that) acting as the potential meals for Lucifer, that Burning Bright would go through the expected motions, safely moving Kelly and Tom from point A to point B without harm until the credits roll. You would be wrong, as I was. It's really remarkable how effectively, relentlessly scary Burning Bright is for nearly an hour straight. That's a lot of momentum to maintain, and for the most part, it keeps the fright level at near hysterical levels. Kelly and Tom never really have a moment to catch their breath (and neither do we) escaping from one room only to be cornered in the next. Finding themselves in increasingly dire situations as door after door is destroyed and even the walls are torn asunder in Lucifer's starved effort to devour them whole. With each second, there are fewer places to hide. This crumbling house from which there is no escape becomes a metaphor of course, for the situation Kelly constantly keeps finding herself in. That she cannot, no matter how hard she tries, leave her defenseless brother behind. For college, her future or for her own survival. It's a nifty little bòn mót that's handled deftly by director Carlos Brooks. Much like the entirety of Burning Bright's stylish, skillfully done whole.


I also cannot commend the production any more highly for choosing to use real tigers throughout the shooting of the film and forgoing the easier, lazier route of CGI. We've all been saying it for years, there is just no comparison when you are dealing with the likes of wolves, werewolves, hyenas, dogs (certainly you know of which films I refer to by the animals alone, or perhaps you've tried to forget as much as I have) and tigers when you present your audience with the real deal, or at the very least, on-camera practical effects. There are brief moments where the tiger looks surreally shoehorned into the scene of course, but its a minor grievance and one that's much easier to look past then badly rendered CGI. Yes it adds a level of realism to your movie and yes your viewers are thankful for it. This one was anyway and I imagine if you have suffered through some of the special effects that I have, you will be too.


In the end, Burning Bright is more than worth your time and deserving of a much wider audience than it is currently receiving. The entire cast is strong, Evigan emerging as this years most memorable, capable final girl by miles. As far as Scream Queens go, she was certainly my favorite of 2010. The scares (and there are many) are handled with the seasoned skill of a master (here's hoping that Brooks visits our little genre again), the film being filled to the brim with setpieces you won't soon forget (see Evigan's laundry shoot climb as example, pure horror awesomenes). It won't be for everyone certainly, but those seeking a balls to the wall night of stylishly crafted, relentless suspense could do no better right now. Good job guys, you deserve all the accolades that hopefully will find you for this one.




Burning Bright stars Briana Evigan (Sorority Row, Fear Itself, Mother's Day, S. Darko), Garret Dillahunt (The Road, No Country For Old Men, Winter's Bone), Charlie Tahan (I Am Legend, Fringe) and Meat Loaf (The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Pelts, Fight Club) and is currently available on DVD and Blu-Ray.

Skull Ratings:
5 Skulls - The Best
4 Skulls - Very Good
3 Skulls - Good / Average
2 Skulls - Poor
1 Skull - The Worst

12/24/10

The Best Horror Films Of The Year - 2010

The Killing Room
(2010, Written by Gus Krieger and Ann Peacock, Directed by Jonathan Liebesman)





There may some debate about whether or not The Killing Room is applicable for inclusion on a "Best Of..." list with the word "horror" in it's title (and it won't be the last time, as far as this site is concerned). So lets just get this misconception out of the way at the start. It is. So lets move on shall we?

In the wake of 9/11 we have seen quite a change in our pop culture landscape. Specifically, in our cinema. While films that have dealt with the current conflict abroad in more serious, straightforward terms have gone largely ignored by the mainstream public. One genre that has had a fairly successful go at tackling this new world order, has been none other than our beloved horror movie. Since 9/11 horror films in particular have mutated into a much more vicious, snarling beast. While they have never been "polite" cinema, the manner in which they go about achieving their chills have altogether altered. In so much that largely gone are the days of reanimated stalkers pursuing bubble headed co-eds through the forest with a machete, or ghosts whispering softly from the darkness of some creaking, haunted abode. If anything summarizes what has made horror films tick since that fateful day in September, it would be this, "blood-lust". Not your typical blood-lust in the manner in which we've grown accustomed to since the late 70's. Say, "machete enters victims chest briefly before the MPAA enforced cuts render said victim dead and limp 2 seconds later." Not that type of blood-lust. Not the blood-lust of the body count / slasher film of the 80's and late 90's. This blood-lust pours out slowly from it's ravaged, dark heart.. The victim's suffering is captured lovingly in every prolonged detail. The screams exquisite, the terror complete, their physical and mental anguish knows no bounds. As their blood runs from their broken and battered bodies in film after film, the American moviegoer has sat rapt in darkened theaters across the country for the better part of a decade now, gleefully salivating at the heightened and cruel carnage on screen. To say that the very public specter of human rights violations, Guantanamo Bay and torture has cast a long, dark shadow over the genre over these past 10 years would be an understatement of the highest order. Not since the fears of radiation and nuclear fallout of the 1950's produced in our collective imagination images of behemoth monsters, animal and human alike (Them!, Godzilla, Attack of the 50 Foot Woman) has the subtext in horror been so frighteningly precise, so obviously on the nose. As the raw meat hits the floor from bound and flailing bodies (Captivity, the whole of the Saw franchise), as images of military occupation begin to dominate otherwise tranquil vistas (28 Weeks Later, The Crazies) and the xenophobia takes effect to the point of rendering every wrinkled, dirty foreign face sinister and devoid of humanity (Hostel, Turistas) and even our homes and privacy are lain waste to as waves of anonymous invaders attempt to gain entry and tear our lives and bodies asunder (The Strangers, Ills), one simple truth cannot be ignored, the horror of the past decade has been the horror of war.




Into this new cinema comes Johnathan Liebesman's The Killing Room, and asks 'do the ends justify the means'? Or more to the point, is the small loss of American casualties on our soil, at the hands of our government, exceptable when it hypothetically aids in waging our side of a war more efficiently? The relevance to our military is nil as the facilitators of this methodology (as depicted in the movie) don't exist on any legitimate, accountable US intelligence playing field.

The film opens with an explanation of the allegedly defunct MK-ULTRA program that was a code name for an illegal, covert, CIA human research program that was ran by the Office of Scientific Intelligence. Using American and Canadian citizens as it's unaware test subjects, the program ran from the early 1950s well into the late 60's. The goal of the program was to study potential means of achieving mind control and developing ways in which to enact more effective forms of torture and interrogation in the hopes of giving us an advantage in combating enemies of the state due to escalated fears during the Cold War. Given it's nature, the program was ordered to disband by the Rockefeller Commission, but by then most records detailing it's actions had been destroyed. Conspiracy theorists have speculated on the the details of this program for decades. It's a sound preoccupation of theirs that is made all the more admissible given the program's sheer plausibility.Now in light of September 11th, the new millenium has given rise to many a refreshed ruminations over what the MK project would resemble in this new age of American "patriotism". Thus adding to our list of new, beefed up cultural boogymen, the American Governement 2.0., and it is here where our story begins.




Four individuals, Crawford (Timothy Hutton), Tony (Shea Whigham), Kerry (Clea Duvall) & Paul (Nick Cannon) sign up for a psychological research study to earn $250 for eight hours of filling out questionnaires. After being shuttled to the location in secret they arrive one by one, in a stark white room overlooked by a sizable two-way mirror. The room contains only a long rectangular table and metal chairs, both items of furniture bolted to the floor. They are presented small piles of test pamphlets full of hundreds of questions to be answered.. Before long, the strangers are making short order of their task and their awkwardness dissipates as their chemistry begins to coalesce. It is shortly revealed that the activities of the four test subjects are prerecorded events being overseen by Dr. Emily Reilly (Chloë Sevigny) whom herself is being studied as closely as they are by Dr, Phillips (a quietly menacing Peter Stormare). When the small group completes their questionnaires, Dr. Phillips enters the room and rather jovially introduces himself and the program. Stationed on the opposite side of the two-way mirror, Emily observes as soon after, the four stranger's real indoctrination, (that they are unwittingly participants in the resurrected MK-ULTRA program)is brought horrifyingly and tragically to light.



There is no end of praise that I could heap upon The Killing Room and all that it achieves within it meager scope. Though it's not the only film taking place in a singular location that wound up on this year's "Best Of..." list (Buried, Devil, and to lesser degrees Frozen and Altitude among the distinguished) The Killing Room forges its own path in that it is almost deceptively unassuming in it's presentation. Stripped away of all other flashy bells and whistles (locations, overwrought action set pieces) and left with not much else to train our eye on but the characters, the story is allowed to be told on the strengths of it's screenplay and actors' performances alone, and boy do they deliver. This is without a doubt one of the most impressive ensembles of the year (certainly thee strongest in any genre offering). Every last one of them brings their A game and contributes immensely to the proceedings. The interaction between doctors Reilly (Sevigny) and Phillips (Stormare), though reserved and respectful (as is appropriate between a student and their superior) and consisting mostly of philosophical back and forth about the study being reviewed, absolutely crackles with tension. It is made all the more taut when Emily realizes that she too is part of the test, her fate hanging on the keen observations she has been expected to provide regarding the four subjects in the white room. Timothy Hutton makes a nice turn as the film's most capable of the bunch. Clea Duvall (one of this decades great unsung Scream Queens) projects the adequate amount of both vulnerability and curiosity. Nick Cannon surprisingly delivers as the group's fragilest member while Shea Whigham (who impressed greatly in The October Country's 2008 fave Splinter) nearly steals the show out from underneath his co-stars as the fiery, ready to fight back everyman.



Amidst all this assured simplicity, further praise should be singled out for Laine Abramson's set design. Though initially one might think that the film's entire budget went into the casting of it's stars to the sacrifice of a "memorable" setting (even as said set design showcases it's actors brilliantly), that notion would be as deceiving as much else of the film is. The severe, sterile white walls that we are trapped within for 93 minutes begin to choke away all hope of survival, smothering us with their oppressive claustrophobia. Ultimately, it was a masterstroke that the production underplayed this aspect of the film, because as it turns out, you won't soon be forgetting that dreadful, terrifying room.

Additionally, an appreciative nod to Brian Tyler is in order. Tyler, who up to this point had yet to really grab me with any of his previous compositions, turns in a score that has emerged as one of the most moving, beautiful scores I've heard in a genre film in sometime. It dips and sweeps the viewer through the full range of emotions leaping off the screen. Dread, hope, loss, sacrifice and terror are all truly felt and realized through his stunning, understated music.

Another name that pleasantly surprised me was the director himself, Jonathan Liebesman. If I had been aware of his hand steering this ship before the credits rolled, I might have been slightly apprehensive in turning over my time to this venture, but thankfully, I was ignorant of this information. Liebesman as you might well remember, (or not) directed 2003's dreadfully awful Darkness Falls (though to his credit, it was a victim of much studio tampering) and helmed the lukewarm, misguided Leatherface prequel The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning. Who knew the man had it in him? Perhaps all he needed was an well written script in addition to the creative freedom provided to a production that is this low key and under the radar. Perhaps, The Killing Room was his consolation for being saddled with such woeful, previous directing duties. Whatever the case may be, Liebesman has finally turned in something that truly shines. Up next from him is 2011's Battle: Los Angeles. Time will tell if he can capture lightning in a bottle twice.




Thought provoking, relevant, suspenseful, adult and effectively capable of leaving it's viewer with a mean case of paranoia, The Killing Room is a surprising success that hits you from out of nowhere (and literally came from out of nowhere for this viewer). When the film ended, I had to ask myself, as a human being, what am I capable of doing to others in the name of survival? How susceptible am I to conditioning to act against my own nature, all but giving up that survival instinct for the "greater good" of my country? Honestly, they are truly unsettling questions that I hope that I never have to answer, but The Killing Room will have you pondering nonetheless.




The Killing Room stars Chloë Sevigny (All Flowers In Time, My Son My Son What Have Ye Done?, American Psycho), Peter Stormare (The Divide, Horsemen, Bruiser), Timothy Hutton (The Alphabet Killer, Secret Window, The Dark Half), Clea Duvall (Carnivàle,The Grudge, Identity), Nick Cannon (Monster House) and Shea Whigham (Machete, Splinter, Blood Creek) and is currently available on DVD and Blu-Ray.


Skull Ratings:
5 Skulls - The Best
4 Skulls - Very Good
3 Skulls - Good / Average
2 Skulls - Poor
1 Skull - The Worst

12/19/10

The Anticipation Is Killing Me


Vanishing on 7th Street

There is a lot of love for Brad Anderson around these parts. Director of the instant classic and don't-watch-this-if-you-are-afraid-of-the-dark creep-fest Session 9, as well as the criminally underexposed The Machinist, to say that I get a little excited whenever a new project of his is coming down the pipeline would be, well an understatement. For my money, I believe Brad Anderson to be a member of that illustrious cadre of filmmakers currently toiling away at the fringes of the genre that though their work goes largely unseen by mainstream audiences, they are in fact making films that will one day be on those seasonal "100 Best Horror Films of All Time" lists that crop up every year around October. Hell for the most part, I believe Session 9 had already been granted that status by writers other than myself, it's just that most people aren't aware of this. Ever since 2008's Transsiberian, Anderson has been passing the time shooting episodes of various television shows, most notably FOX's critical darling yet viewer starved Fringe (seriously, watch this show and thank me later). I'd been recently wondering if Anderson was up to anything in the feature film arena, when news broke that indeed he had been and was premiering a new horror film, Vanishing On 7th Street, at the 2010 Toronto Film Festival. Early buzz has been mixed, with advanced reviews alternating back and forth from negative to positive. There's been comparisons and accusations of ripping off everything from Richard Matheson's novel I Am Legend, to the 2010 Remedy Entertainment video game Alan Wake (not to mention 1984's cult classic Night Of The Comet of all things), have been fired in it's direction. I'll reserve any judgment on the matter until after I've seen the final cut though. However, I will level this criticism it's way. While both are capable actors, I think that I am going to find Hayden Christensen and John Leguizamo's presence in the film...distracting. Not in a good way either. I think both actor's faces are a little to familiar for me to truly lose myself in their characters but then I guess I shall see. End of minor criticism.

Now, on to the film in question because honestly I am chewing at the bit to set my eyes on this sucker. In fact, I'm already creeped out.

Magnet Releasing's Press Release:

From director Brad Anderson (Session 9, Transsiberian, The Machinist) comes VANISHING ON 7TH STREET, a terrifying, apocalyptic thriller that taps into one of humankind’s most primal anxieties: fear of the dark. An unexplained blackout plunges the city of Detroit into total darkness, and by the time the sun rises, only a few people remain—surrounded by heaps of empty clothing, abandoned cars and lengthening shadows. A small handful of strangers that have survived the night (Hayden Christensen, Thandie Newton, John Leguizamo and newcomer Jacob Latimore) each find their way to a rundown bar, whose gasoline-powered generator and stockpile of food and drink make it the last refuge in a deserted city. With daylight beginning to disappear completely and whispering shadows surrounding the survivors, they soon discover that the enemy is the darkness itself, and only the few remaining light sources can keep them safe. As time begins to run out for them, darkness closes in and they must face the ultimate terror.


Vanishing On 7th Street's Teaser Trailer:








Vanishing on 7th Street Trailer
Uploaded by teasertrailer. - Classic TV and last night's shows, online.

The Best Horror Films of the Year - 2010

The Reef
(2010, Written / Directed by Andrew Traucki)




The Reef presented itself as quite the conundrum when contemplating whether or not to include it on this year's list. Here we have what is essentially an Open Water ripoff (or send up or homage, you choose) by Australian director / screenwriter Andrew Traucki. Traucki is the man responsible for 2007's Black Water, itself inspired by Open Water. Concluding, The Reef rips off Open Water and its own director's Black Water, itself a ripoff of Open Water (of which all three films are allegedly based on true stories). Still with me? Hence the conundrum. Do I reward a film with inclusion on this list that so blatantly cannibalizes another film, not to mention the same director's previous film? Well as it turns out, when the film is this good I do.

When their vessel is overturned after running afoul of a submerged rock base, the five person crew of a small sailboat is left drifting on the Great Barrier Reef. With little hope of rescue, they are faced with two options; stay aboard their crippled boat and face the prospect of dying from thirst, starvation and exposure or make an attempt to swim north 10 miles away in the direction of Turtle Island, hoping to find it amidst the rising waves before something in the water finds them first. The odds of survival stacked against the crew, a small group of them decide to risk the swim. They take to the water and set out for their only hope. Miles out to sea, the swimmers are closing in on land, when a fin breaks the surface of the water. Soon the realization sets in that they are being stalked by a 15-foot pointer shark. Death can come from any direction at any time. Death, which possesses a mouthful of razor sharp teeth. Can the small band of survivors make it to land with all their pieces intact or will the hungry sea claim them, pulling them beneath the blood stained waves one by one until only their memory remains?


In the name of transparency, I have to admit something upfront before I continue. I am incredibly biased when commenting on the effectiveness of killer shark movies to terrify and torment their viewers. Personally, there is nothing more unsettling to me than the idea of being at the mercy of a shark. It is hands down, my greatest, deepest fear. The kind of phobia that I have spent hours obsessively pondering over. So from the outset there is the slight possibility that this movie affected me in ways that it won't others. I say "possibility" because I believe that for the most part I am only going to be affected by a film that is genuinely good (example: hack Renny Harlin's Deep Blue Sea had me rolling my eyes from beginning to end). The Reef is genuinely good. Its better than good. It is great and some years down the line (like a few other films on this list) it deserves to be looked back on with classic status firmly established in relation to its name.

What we have here is an exhausting exercise in breathtaking suspense. The Reef sets out to put it's audience through the ringer and conquers us exquisitely. I think I was in danger of breaking the armrests free from the chair I was sitting in I was gripping them so tightly. A distinction that The Reef shares with two other films on this year's "Best Of..." list, Burning Bright and Frozen (curiously, all three films revolving around man vs. nature scenarios to one degree or another). Here Traucki masterfully wrings menace and dread from every splash, every ripple of water. As the sharks get bolder, hungrier and closer, Traucki lays his cards on the table and we soon learn that he's not playing favorites. Anybody could be swallowed whole at any time. This is an aspect that pays off in spades in the suspense department because every single character is written sympathetically and brought to life nicely by the talented cast. There's really no one person whom you'd like to see eaten alive and every time the ocean turns blood red, the film packs a small emotional punch to your gut. Traucki conveys a sincere sense of loss when these moments occur which only helps along his cause (that being, to scare the ever loving shit out of his audience). As we all know, coming to care about your protagonist's fates can only heighten the tension of a story (yet its a lesson that 95% of working screenwriters could afford to learn). Aiding in the film's potency, is the fact that the actors were filmed with real sharks, a few feet away from them in the water (much like 2003's Open Water, though here the effect is more successful). There is no "Bruce" of Jaws fame or badly rendered CGI à la Deep Blue Sea infamy (Renny Harlan, you HACK! Wait, I think I said that already. Actually I can't say it enough). It's the real deal in The Reef, humongous and insatiable killing machines circling ever closer to our panicked and terrified heroes. To say that it adds a level of authenticity to the proceedings is a given.


In the end this is what real nightmares are made of. Alone and small, insignificant to the cruelty of nature's voracious maw and completely helpless to fight back in any way, your only option is to kick your exhausted legs and swim. Just pray that all that kicking for your life doesn't attract more cold black eyes watching you from the dark ocean's depths.


The Reef stars Damien Walshe-Howling (Ned Kelly), Zoe Naylor (McLeod's Daughters), Gyton Grantley (Beneath Hill 60), Adrienne Pickering (Knowing) and Kieran Darcy-Smith (The Cave), and arrives on UK DVD January 24th, 2011.
American release date TBA.

To follow The Reef online visit http://www.reefmovie.com

Skull Ratings:
5 Skulls - The Best
4 Skulls - Very Good
3 Skulls - Good / Average
2 Skulls - Poor
1 Skull - The Worst
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...